Pockets are wider than designed

Hi!

I’ve got a problem with my X50 Journeyman. I want to make holes for 5 mm steel pins. To make sure I get the right fit I’ve made a design with multiple hole sizes, ranging from 4.8 to 5.11 mm. However, cutting them leaves me with holes 6 mm or larger.

I am a novice using Fusion 360, but I have successfully cut things with great accuracy before. I have however reset the machine recently and moved it onto a new table. Maybe some settings are off, even though I have followed Onefinity’s guides while resetting.

Do you get any ideas of things I should check?

I had some issues in the past where I purchased some 1/8" end mills but in fact they were 3MM, this cause some minor size discrepancies.
Pat

Are you using a drilling operation or pocket? If it’s a drilling operation, you may be seeing the results of run-out where the router’s spindle is just a touch wobbly so the holes aren’t cut concentrically.

If it’s a pocket, make sure you’re doing an inside cut with a bit that’s smaller than the hole size. If you’re using VCarve, use a spiral cut so it moves down into the pocket in an expanding circle.

1 Like

I just measured my 1/8" bit and it’s 3,11 mm (1/8" = 3,175 mm). So in theory I think the holes would get smaller and not bigger. Confusing.

I have tried drilling and pocket. Bit is smaller than pocket. The router sits firmly and so does the bit.

Are there any settings within the Onefinity controller I could have a look at?

My point was the actual diameter of the bit is not always as advertised.
Sorry if I was confusing.
Pat

1 Like

Can you post the .nc code for this. That way I will be able to tell if it is a Fusion problem or a machine problem.

1 Like

No no, you’re not confusing me! Trying to cut right sized holes is confusing me. I grateful for your input :blush:

bjas 4.nc (411.2 KB)

Sure! Thanks!

Update: I have updated the machine to 1.4.1 now, tightened everything and the holes I get are still 0.5 mm too wide. A hole that’s supposed to be 5 mm is 5.5 mm.

Two suggestions:

  1. Tape a trustworthy ruler down on your waste board with a v bit at zero. Tell the machine to move as far as possible and see if it lines up with the ruler.
  2. Are you using finishing passes? It’s possible the bit is just deflecting if your cuts are too extreme. It’s probably not this, but can’t hurt to ask.
1 Like

So see if this is what you intended.
The top hole is 4.80mm dia.
The second hole down is 4.90mm dia.
The third hole down is 4.96mm
The bottom hole is 5.0mm

That is what the nc code is programmed for so if that is what you intended, with a 3.175mm cutter, then what you did in Fusion is good. The only thing I might wonder about is the feedrate 1666mm/m ramping down is fine but I wonder if 5000mm/m on the final pass at the bottom might be too fast to hold the tolerance.
Other things to look to for on the machine/cutter side is actual dia. of cutter - i dont remember if you said you measured it. Can’t always go by what’s on the tin. And wobble of cutter in the spindle. If you don’t have a dial indicator to measure that you can use paper method against the side of something for each flute on the cutter.

1 Like

Yeah, those numbers are correct.

I’ll try and give the final pass a lower rate to see if that keeps things cleaner.

Good idea with the ruler! Thanks!

Sometimes when holding a tight tolerance, I will cheat the CAM program (Estlcam) by specifying my 1/8" end mill is .130 so the program thinks the end mill is larger than it actually is. Then as I run the program, I will adjust the stated tool diameter until I get the results I want. This method has served me quite well on various projects. If it’s a round hole, then this method is used with circular interpolation. If it’s a drill operation and I’m wanting something more exact than what I think the end mill will produce (or I lack the nominal size end mill), I use an undersize drill & then redrill or ream the hole on the drill press.

This is of course something you want to do on a single tool program, and not a larger program with multiple tool changes for obvious reasons.

1 Like

Another thing that I don’t think I’ve seen mentioned here is bit deflection. Especially with smaller diameter bits, or bits that extend long past the collet/holder this can be an issue.

To test you can set a few holes to Conventional cut and a few to Climb. I don’t recall the precise terminology in Fusion but I know that setting is there. If they come out measurably different with identical tool paths then your bit is deflecting.

1 Like

I’m doing the same thing right now…building cabinets with 5mm shelf pin holes…here’s what worked for me… I used a 3/16" bit. I tried the drill program first and the pins were too tight… they’d go in but you really had to force them… so I tried a pocket operation with the same bit but increased the size from .1875 (3/16) to .19… perfect fit

2 Likes

Just a thought, which you probably already had and done. When you measure the actual tool diameter, do you put that diameter into the tool database?

I’ve had problems getting proper hole sizes until I went in and measured all my bits and put the actual diameters into the tool database. That for the most part solve my problems. Again. Just a thought.

1 Like

Were you using Fusion? Would you care to show your f3d-file or screenshots of how you set the tool path up? I can of course change the hole size, but I shouldn’t have to. A hole that is designed to be 5 mm should not turn out being 6 mm instead when milled. It’s crazy.

I think I have done that yes. Anyway, the bit is slightly smaller than the 1/8" it should be, so the holes shouldn’t be bigger than expected due to size difference. But thanks, I will most definitely double check when I’m back in the workshop.

1 Like