The descriptions says that the new 60mm rails are twice at stiff as the outgoing 50mm rails. Just curious why not make both x and y on the new 60mm rails? Also, the z axis has changed, but has it been beefed up at all or were the “wings” just removed for more travel?
I don’t know if 1F beefed up the Z axis but I did read in a response from them at launch that removing the wings (which I understand were for mounting dust boots?) allowed them to gain the extra travel.
Hard to say, but probably because of overall cost and there is far more torque on the z axis while cutting, necessitating the upgrade for better rigidity.
-Tom
I guess thinking about it out loud, the Y axis runs on four 50mm rails and driven by 2 ball screws and steppers, vs the X only having 2 rails and one ball screw/motor. Cross sectional area of Y rails is about 7850 sq/mm vs 5652 sq/mm for the new X. Old 50mm rails would have been 3925 sq/mm. Looking at an increase of about 44 percent more cross sectional area without “stiffy”. Old gantry with “stiffy” actually gives more cross sectional area but only by 235ish sq/mm. If they come out with a “stiffy” for the new X, cross sectional area well surpasses the old X with “stiffy” by a lot, and even surpasses Y at a whopping 8478 sq/mm. I know the 80mm Z spindle mount has been beefed up a bunch looking at the launch video…hard to see, but to my eye, it does seem like the rest of the Z has added thickness in certain areas as well. WHY ARE THERE NOT MORE VIDEOS OF THE NEW MACHINES IN ACTION! I’m a batch 2 and have to wait until Feb…I need something @Onefinity to keep me busy until then:) Current nerd-out session over.
Another thought for you in regards to the differences in total rigidity between the Elite Gen 1 Machines and the new machines is that the Y rails on Gen 1 were 35mm. In Summary:
Gen 1:
Y Rail - 35mm (4 total, 2 each on the left and right)
X Rail - 50mm (2 or 3 total depending on if you have the option stiffy upgrade)
Gen 2:
Y Rail - 50mm (4 total, 2 each on left and right)
X Rail - 60mm (2 total, as 1F isn’t offering and doesn’t seem to need to offer a stiffy upgrade)
In my mind, even though I stuck with the Gen 1 machine when I had a chance to cancel my Batch 2 Redline for the possibility of something newer, the Gen 2 machine should be substantially more rigid than Gen 1 for less total cost (at least apparently, outside of launch and black Friday deals), and complexity. I’m still happy with/my decision to stick with the Batch 2, but I think 1F is doing a great job of increasing the state of the art of their machines while doing everything they can to hold costs down.
Ah, I assumed that gen1 at some point got updated to 50mm rails on all axis? So even anything x50 still ran 35mm on Y?
Thanks and interesting!
No, I don’t think his information is correct. I have a buildbotics X50 with stiffy and all of the rails are the same size 50mm.
I just received my Journeyman Elite Redline Batch 2 and the rail sizes are as I stated. Which made me wonder, are the 50mm rails only on the Y axis on the Foreman (48” x 48”) size machines? And that is indeed the case according to the Gen 1 product spec sheet where 1F explicitly enumerates the rail sizes for the Journeyman and the Elite, though it didn’t appear to mention the Woodworker.
I did not find a explicit reference to Y rail sizes based on machine size on the Gen 2 spec sheet, so I can’t at this time say with confidence what the Y rail size will be across the Gen 2 series.
Apologies if I gave anyone misinformation previously, as they say never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity. ![]()
Gen 1 Elite:
FM: x50 y50
JM: x50 yx35
WW: x50 yx35
Gen 2 Elite:
FM: x60 y50
JM: x60 y50
WW: x60 y50
Thanks, want to add any info about the new Z? Does it have anymore beefiness over the older gen1 z20? Any insight on why not 60mm all the way around? ![]()