Is it possible to only home Z after a program? Meaning stay in place after the program has been run and get the bit out of the way?
I’ve yet to crash the machine during a program, it’s after the programs are finished and the machine rapids home (straight diagonal angle) that I’ve crashed a dust boot into a clamp. I’d like to avoid this and jog the machine with the joystick after it’s over.
That’s entirely a feature of your CAM. Fusion 360, for example, annoyingly insists on moving the router to home (or a coordinate you define) after milling. Carbide Create (if I remember well) does not.
You could edit the g-code and remove the G0 command to return home.
Thank you! I will look into Fusion 360 to address this. I hope there is something that I can do to the post-processor so I don’t have to remember every time.
Thank you! I was thinking the same thing and will likely make a different dust boot that travels with the router. If I do this and what you are saying I shouldn’t have an issue. The suck-it system is what is crashing since it is stationary. It makes sense for some operations but not others.
Now when the program ends the Z raises up to home and it stays in place regarding to X and Y so the Suckit doesn’t crash into clamps.
I plan on looking into how to update the post so I don’t have to do these manually, although it isn’t much trouble. I found this video, it seems attainable.
If you are using Fusion 360 all you have to do is select clearance height from the safe retracts menu. After job the machine will retract to Z clearance height and then stop. You can move with the joy pad after. Simple
@alldaysammyj I am using Fusion 360. Thank you this is so much easier! I’ll give it a try this evening.
BTW - Do you have a Fusion fix for posting M2 rather than M30 at the end of the program? M30 sends the spindle to the start of the program. For me anyways. No worries if not.
@blaghislain the issue I was having with M30 was it was sending the program back to start and running it again. M2 ends the program where it sits and it much preferred for my current workflow. I’m not sure if this is an issue for anyone else.
Is the M6/M0 box meant to pause the program between each process? I can see this as a great feature for proofing a program. If I want to group processes in a single post (all using the same tool) I’m assuming I would not check this box so it will run through all of them without me having to be standing at the machine.
The M6/M0 feature came from @Aiph5u suggestion here. This permit to probe for each tool change. User that dont need the pause can use the native ‘Output M06’ property.
@blaghislain Thank you again for reving the post processor.
The M2 function is working well and perfect for what I was looking for. The M6/M0 check box is always triggering the pause feature regardless if it is checked or not. Not an issue for me just yet but I would prefer to not have to be at the machine when I link multiple tool paths with the same tool, which I do 80% of the time.
@blaghislain 've downloaded the new post (same location) and will give it a try this afternoon/evening. Thank you for making the update so quick! You rock!